Multitudes are marching to the big kettle drum. Voices callin’, voices cryin’.

February 6th, 2010

http://www.boston.com/ae/tv/articles/201…

MTV’s hit reality show [ Jersey Shore ] put put the spotlight on the style of a group of 20-something Italian-Americans, self-professed “guidos” and “guidettes,” as they partied and fist-pumped their way through a Seaside, N.J., summer.

And now their style – heavy on gravity-defying hair and deeply revealing tops – is catching on among a non-”guido” audience…

I recall reading a prediction about this somewhere.

Oh yes… I think it was in Revelations. Somewhere in between “Satan and his double edged sword” and “four living creatures covered in eyeballs”…

(subject line hattip)

the American Dream

February 6th, 2010

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/love_…

A group of immigrant high-school students got a senior prom that could happen only in America. When the yacht “Fantasy” set sail for a three-hour cruise around Manhattan last June, the liquor started to flow and bartenders served drink after drink to the chaperones — including some 15 teachers and the principal …

Finally, a buxom chemistry teacher, 25, wrapped herself around a boy as they danced slowly. They locked lips…

It wasn’t only a spectacle on the upper-deck dance floor… A large TV screen projected the action on the lower level…

The school is one of 10 in the city supported by the Internationals Network for Public Schools, a nonprofit whose motto is “Opening doors to the American dream.”

Man, now there is a motto.

…although it might be better applied to the liquor than to the nonprofit…

“The Press”

February 6th, 2010

http://www.gormogons.com/2010/02/tea-wit…

The Czar has often said that the press is pretty much a fourteen-year-old girl. They bop around from crush to crush, think they know everything, go straight to hysterical tears when someone turns on them, and especially see the world as whether you’re in or you’re out at the moment.

Good point.

I’ll merely call attention to the fact that he mispelled Andrew Sullivan’s name.

Unless “The Press” is some sort of Jersey-Shore-style nickname?

BSG finale

February 5th, 2010

Because I watch TV via DVD, I see everything (well, everything that I watch – about five or six shows total, about three of which are on the air) a year after normal people.

I saw the BSG finale the other day.

I’ve got much to say about it, at some point, but for now, I’ll just mention that that night I fell asleep and had dreams of fighting Centurions.

I was quite annoyed that the 12 gauge slugs from my Bennelli M-1 weren’t knocking them down, even while Starbuck’s woefully underpowered 9mm submachinegun had killed them in the episode.

So I did a tactical retreat to the attic where (in real life) I’ve got my .50.

That worked.

If only real life problems were so easy to deal with!

news from JWZ and his nightclub (”the difference between big government progressivism and communism is just a matter of scale” remix)

February 5th, 2010

http://www.dnalounge.com/backstage/log/2…

Remember that citation we got last month, which may or may not have been for “failing to keep the sidewalk clear” at 12:45 AM on New Year’s Eve? Well, the court date was this week. Barry showed up at 8 AM and spent many hours waiting first in one line, then being told to wait in another line, and then a third line, where finally the clerk looked at the ticket, typed in its number, and said, “This ticket is invalid.”

“What does that mean?”, Barry asked.

“It means you don’t have to do anything. Here’s your receipt, zero dollars due.”

“But, invalid how? What makes it invalid?”

“Look, I’m not going to play detective here”, she said.

After some more non-answers, he was finally told to come back on Thursday, where he wasted another half day trying to get a whole gaggle of clerks to explain to him what was invalid about it. As far as we can tell, from the not-very-communicative hints that were dropped from behind the bulletproof glass, “invalid” means either: the citation was never entered into the system in the first place; or at some point, someone reviewed it and clicked the “Invalid!” checkbox.

(You’d think that if someone manually invalidated your citation — meaning that you didn’t do anything wrong, and it was wrong for you to have gotten the citation in the first place — they might do you the courtesy of calling to let you know that you don’t actually have to show up at 8 AM and waste half your day. But no, that’s apparently not how it works.)

So, my assumption is unchanged: that the issuance of this citation was pure harassment. Officer Bertrand wrote it knowing full well that it would not be prosecuted, and that he would never have to defend his claims in front of a judge. I believe that Bertrand and Ott showed up at DNA Lounge on New Year’s Eve with the intention of citing us for something, and when the only thing they could come up with was something that they knew wouldn’t stick, they wrote us this “fake” ticket solely to flex their muscle and waste our time.

We have heard many stories of this kind of thing happening to operators of other venues over the past couple of years: tickets that, once you get to the front of the hours-long line, turn out to not really exist at all.

Most people are relieved when this happens to them, because it means they “got off easy”.

JWZ, to the best of my knowledge, continues to be left of center.

The issue, I imagine, is that big intrusive government is a dandy thing – it just “needs to be done right”.

See also: “communism is a great idea, it’s just never been tried”.

See also: TJIC’ ongoing rant comprising the two closely related points that:

(a) if when you attempt to implement “wonderful communism” and every single frickin’ time you get mass murder, starvation, and gulags, then that is communism

(b) if when you attempt to implement “wonderful big-government progressivism” and every single frickin’ time you get high and inefficient taxes, corrupt police, a hide-bound bureaucracy that would rather deny citizens services than allow them to be efficiently provided, subsidies to the rich via farm subsidies and publicly run symphonies, and more, then that is big-government progressivism.

tower of meat

February 4th, 2010

Your mission, should you choose to accept it:

  • Go the Burger King website.
  • Select the triple whopper.
  • Up the number of beef patties from 3 to 5.
  • Click the “more” button on the right hand side.
  • Up the bacon to 5.
  • Add 5 “steakhouse patties”.
  • Add 5 “steakhouse XT”.
  • Add 5 “Whopper Junior patties”.
  • Contemplate the sheer awesomeness of a 6,880 calorie burger that has almost half a pound (197 grams) of saturated fat, over 1 lb of total fat, and 18 times the USRDA of sodium (8,990 mg).

Bonus activity:

  • click “add to order”
  • enjoy the popup you get which says “would you like anything else with that?”

strange but true: a new reason to hate FDR

February 4th, 2010

Mr. Redacted writes:

Another reason to !@#$ FDR’s skull

http://volokh.com/2010/01/27/barack-obam…

which points us here:

A fascinating post from Prof. Sarah B. Lawsky, on TaxProf.

I hadn’t known that FDR “paid taxes at the rates in effect when he took office, even as statutory tax rates increased,” on the theory that applying the higher taxes “violated the Constitutional provision that states that the president’s compensation ’shall be neither increased nor diminished during the period for which he shall have been elected.’” (The post includes a copy of FDR’s claim form on the subject.)

So the bastard destroyed one of the freest countries the world has ever seen, built a socialist state on its wreckage, and then refused to pay all the new taxes he pushed through?

We need to get all John Varley on the guy: invent time travel, travel back in time to April 1, 1945, and when he goes to the bathroom, swap him out for a protein robot that returns to the sitting room and declares “I have a terrific pain in the back of my head” and then dies.

Back in the present we will then use advanced medical technology to restore FDR to full health … before torturing him almost to death.

Several times.

HeavyInk is on the front page of Boing Boing

February 4th, 2010

I’m not a fan of all of the writers at Boing Boing, but I do like Mark Fraunfelder (we’ve talked through a Make Magazine / SmartFlix connection), and I’m thrilled to have this

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/02/04/law…

Law firm demands retailer destroy all copies of Olivia Munn comic, retailer refuses

By Mark Frauenfelder

Travis of Heavy Ink says: “Thought you might be interested to hear that lawyers are threatening HeavyInk to remove a parody comic about Olivia Munn. We’re fighting back.”

Click the image on the right to see the law firm’s letter.

Legal challenge to HeavyInk: ‘destroy all copies of Celebrity Showdown Olivia Munn’

it was very nearly perfect

February 4th, 2010

http://booksbikesboomsticks.blogspot.com…

I was mildly disappointed that a flaming midget clown on a tricycle never pedaled furiously through the meadow yelling “Verboten!”. Other than that, it was very nearly perfect.

LOL!

wherein TJIC gets a bit pedantic about firearms

February 4th, 2010

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/instapund…

PRESS GENIUSES: ABC says Grenade Launcher – FOX says 37mm Cobray Grenade (Flare) Launcher. Flares are not grenades.

I can’t say that I’m 100% on board with Insty here.

Let the record show that the DoD started using the 40mm M-203 grenade launcher (either underslung on an M-16, or stand alone, with its own stock), and the civilian market cloned the design, but made it 3mm smaller so as to not be backwards compatible with government issue 40mm grenades.

3mm, for those not used to metric, is 1/8″.

Basically, there’s no way to tell a 37mm flare launcher apart from a 40mm grenade launcher by eye.

The one way you can do it is to try to load a 40mm grenade – one will take it, one won’t.

On the other hand, empty 37 mm cardboard flare tubes, black powder, primers, and ball bearings are all readily available, so if anyone wanted to make a 37mm grenade, it’d be the work of 45 minutes.

It’s even legal – you’ve just got to have a Class 3 license and pay your $200 destructive device fee to the BATF.

a modest proposal

February 4th, 2010

http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2010/0…

ATF agent sues agency, and it sues him

Some interesting developments over at Clean Up ATF. An agent had infiltrated the Hell’s Angels and Aryan Brotherhood, they managed to find out where he lived, and he and his family got credible violent threats. The agency agreed to put him in the LEOs’ version of witness protection and kept screwing up. When he pointed that out, his superior retaliated by withdrawing what little security he did have, and his house promptly was burned to then ground. He sues for breach of contract, ATF moves to dismiss, and loses the motion.

Then, apparently, ATF gets a US Attorney to sue him for having published a book that allegedly damaged its reputation. (I guess the expiration of the Sedition Act limited the remedy).

At the bottom of the page is a link to the court’s order denying the motion to dismiss. Skim thru to p. 25, where the court lists the allegations of the complaint. Pretty spectacular.

I love the first comment:

I’m trying really hard to care when an agency devoted to enforcing unconstitutional laws turns on one of its own, but it’s not happening.

If I had my druthers, the house of every employee of the BATF would be burned to the ground.

…and a copy of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights would be left near the wreckage.

Arlington survey

February 4th, 2010

The town government has a survey here basically asking us if we want to be analy raped with or with out lube.

I’m only three pages in and already I’m seeing lies.

For example:

Question 7:

Currently the Town operates an engine company at each of its three stations, as well as one(1) ladder truck, and one(1) ambulance. Eliminating an engine company for a portion of the year could save approximately $200,000. However, when an engine is out of service, this reduction would have a negative impact on our response time to emergencies and overall fire fighting, our rescue services, and our mutual aid agreement.

Eliminate an engine company for a portion of the year (Save $200,000)

  • Desirable
  • Acceptable
  • Unacceptable

About five years ago we paid an outside consulting firm $30,000 of stolen tax dollars to see if we needed three firehouses.

The consulting firm did a bunch of research and then delivered a report that said “no, you can achieve benchmark standard response times using just two of the firehouses”.

This wasn’t the result that the town bureacrats wanted, so they 86′ed the study and poured a bunch of money into renovating one of the decrepit firehouses.

Asked why they ignored the study, the answer was “Oh, the study was poorly done”.

Asked why they didn’t demand their money back if they got an inadequate product, they answered … well, no, they didn’t answer at all.

So, now we find this back on the table, but the survey is lying and saying that closing the fire house would have a negative effect.

This whole survey, by the way, is intended to justify an 11% tax hike. A helpful graph shows that the town government expects its expenses to grow from $113M this year to $138M in 2015.

That’s 4% per year growth … even when the rate of inflation is around 2.8%, and the taxes automatically go up 2.5% each year.

So, if we only allow town spending to rise at the rate of inflation, and we boost taxes at the normal rate, in 2015 the budget gap will be $1.8 M … but according to the scare figures the town is handing out, the budget gap is going to be almost 10 times that, at $16M.

$1.8M could easily be financed by cutting some of the stupid programs we have in town.

experience

February 4th, 2010

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/instapund…

The good news is that, when it comes to reshaping the U.S. mortgage market … or any market for that matter …, the Obama administration’s top guns are bringing to bear all of the brisk, rough-’n'-ready entrepreneurial know-how they picked up in their previous careers as university professors, nonprofit activists, and holders of political sinecures.

Zing!

resolutions

February 4th, 2010

Oops. Seem to have skipped this last weekend.

Current progress :

  • write a novel – 0 pages done
  • lathe – 3 items partially done
  • remodel the bathroom – no action
  • learn guitar – 2 lessons, daily practice
  • corporate debt by $100k – $54k down, on schedule
  • start brand 3 – in progress
  • Lose 50 60 lbs – 14 lbs down, on schedule

Need to kick start the ‘novel’ and ‘lathe’ tasks.

Sigh.

On the other hand, I’ve decided to up the ante on the weight loss by 20% – going for 60 instead of 50.

In health related news, took some vital stats this AM.

  • blood sugar: 94 MG/DL
  • blood pressure: 139 / 84
  • resting pulse: 52 BPM

Blood pressure (specifically, systolic) could be lower – under 120 would be nice. I’m happy with everything else though – for a guy who’s out of shape, 94 MG/DL and 52 BPM seem decent.

( That 52 BPM will climb during the course of the day – pound back a few let-me-dive-into-this-database-bull-!@#$% motivational caffeinated beverages, and – oh yes – it will climb! )

The chain in those handcuffs is high-tensile steel. It’d take you ten minutes to hack through it with this. Now, if you’re lucky, you could hack through your ankle in five minutes. Go.

February 3rd, 2010

Had a T-bone for dinner.

Decent, but I experimented a bit with the cooking (5 minutes on each side, zero oven time, no rest) and it was a bit rarer in the middle than I would have liked. As in “absolutely rare”. I also blame the thickness of the steak – it was a big one.

Anyway, when done, I cut the uneaten meat off the bone, bagged it as leftovers, and took the bone down to the shop so as to evenly divide it for the pups. Clamped it in the machinists vise, selected which hacksaw to use (used hacksaw frames are a buck or so at a used tool store or a flea market, and new ones are only slightly more … if you don’t have three set up with various blades, you’re missing out) and sawed right through the really serious bone in … like, two-and-a-half strokes.

Man, knowing how absolutely easy it is to cut up the bones of a large mammal … that’s a tidbit of scary knowledge.

the other senator from Massachusetts

February 2nd, 2010

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/poli…

WASHINGTON — As anger at last month’s Supreme Court decision that gutted decades of campaign finance laws continues to build on Capitol Hill, Senator John Kerry joined calls for Congress and the states to amend the Constitution for only the 28th time in its history, a dramatic step he said was necessary to restore restrictions on corporate influence in politics that were struck down in the ruling.

“We need a constitutional amendment to make it clear once and for all that corporations do not have the same free speech rights as individuals,” Kerry testified at a Senate hearing today.

Indeed.

Incorporated bodies like the New York Times and the United Auto Workers should definitely not be able to influence national politics by spending –

wait -

what’s that you say?

Oh, alright, never mind.

But, seriously, whenever anyone argues that we need to ammend the constitution to shrink the free speech rights that we have, I’m pretty much immediately off the bus.

TJIC responds to Obama’s speech

February 2nd, 2010

http://www.boston.com/news/politics/poli…

NASHUA — Promising jobs and asking for patience, President Obama pitched his economic plan to a receptive New Hampshire audience, defending his plan to cut deficits and ease unemployment even as lawmakers back in Washington picked apart his budget blueprint.

“Because there’s no magic wand that will make economic problems that were years in the making disappear overnight, it’s easy for politicians to exploit the anger and anguish folks are feeling right now,” Obama told a crowd of about 1,600 at a Nashua high school, acknowledging that “folks here in New Hampshire have been tested by the last two years.”

“Exploit” ? Are there any examples of politicians (presumably Republican politicians) “exploiting” the “anger and anguish” of folks stuck in a crappy economy? The one thing I see is Republicans, who (theoretically) ideologically oppose big wasteful government are arguing “see…this is exactly the big wasteful government we’ve been telling you about!”.

But things could have been much worse, Obama said, if his administration had not gone ahead with the financial bailouts and $787 billion stimulus program so reviled by his Republican opponents. “Because of the steps we took, the markets have stabilized. No one’s worrying about another Great Depression like they were a year ago. The worst of the storm has passed,” Obama said.

I stand by the bank stabilization, for reasons that I outlined back at the time.

…but is there any evidence that keeping GM alive, and buying off union votes with specially crafted legislation that preserves their jobs and pensions while screwing the non-unionized folks they worked right along side, is “stabilizing the markets” ?

While Obama repeated his calls for bipartisanship, his message had an accusatory undertone toward Republicans, who have succeeded in holding up health care overhaul and many other items on Obama’s wish-list.

So bipartisanship is apparently defined as “agreeing with the pro-Democrat, anti-Republican strategies that I love and you hate” ?

During a question and answer session, the president almost mockingly welcomed GOP ideas

Wow – the Globe is describing Obama’s tone as scornful and mocking – why, oh why wouldn’t Republicans want to extend a hand to such a great sportsman ?

He noted that they voted nearly unanimously against the Recovery Act

The “recovery act”, by the way is “the stimulus” – which is to say, a massive pork barrel of fraud, waste, and stupidity. We’re doing everything – bailing out bloated state governments, replacing dumbwaiters, and buying door mats.

So – Republicans voted against it?

Sounds good to me!

“It’s one thing to have an honest difference of opinion on something. There’s nothing wrong with that,” Obama said, in shirt sleeves and gesturing companionably to the audience “It’s another to walk away from your responsibilities to confront the challenges facing this country because you think it’s good short-term politics. That’s what we can’t afford.”

If by “Republicans walking away from their responsibilities”, he means that they’re voting against his FDR-style alphabet soup of new programs and spending, then I support that 100%.

The president detailed a plan to help expand lending to small business through tax cuts and assistance to community banks. Under the program, $30 billion in returned cash for the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) would be made available to help smaller banks lend to local businesses.

Two years ago my biggest problem was lack of capital – I would have borrowed a million or so on top of the 3/4 of a mill that I was already in hock for.

However, given Obama’s budget, his spending, his attempts to drastically increase entitlements, the spectre of massive tax hikes in the near future, and more, I am no longer looking for capital.

Instead I am:

  • laying off all of my salaried staff
  • keeping my hourly staff fixed
  • paying down my debt as rapidly as possible
  • trying to figure out how – aside from taking a government job – to make money in a hostile business climate

Obama’s plans are creating a world so uncertain that I refuse to take on any debt at all. I’ve been throwing away solicitations to borrow funds for the last few months.

“We’re going to start where most new jobs do – with small businesses,” Obama said. “These are the companies that begin in basements and garages when an entrepreneur takes a chance on his dream, or a worker decides it’s time she became her own boss.”

What’s the point of creating wealth if we’re going to return to confiscatory rates of taxation?

Heck, with a massive debt hanging over our heads, growth is going to be a lot slower, and it’s going to be hard to create wealth in the first place.

Back in Washington, Republicans gave the small business initiative a sour reception, saying the returned TARP money should be used to pay down the deficit, estimated to reach a record $1.6 trillion this year and $1.3 trillion next year.

Indeed.

To do otherwise is get the government in the business of borrowing money from Chinese to hand it to banks, in the hopes that they’ll loan it to small businesses that will create jobs.

Why, exactly, do we need the government in that loop?

There’s capital to be had – if small business want to borrow and the Chinese want to lend, it will happen on its own.

The American people don’t need to cosign these debts.

“special interests”

February 2nd, 2010

http://meganmcardle.theatlantic.com/arch…

“We need to stand up to the special interests, bring Republicans and Democrats together, and pass the farm bill immediately,” Barack Obama

The gods of logic are weeping.

cognitive dissonance

February 2nd, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/us/pol…

it would be a terrible mistake to borrow against our children’s future to pay our way today

That’s Obama telling us that deficit spending for current consumption is a bad idea.

I agree.

…but WT* !?!?

I continue to think that the Republicans should introduce a balanced budget amendment. It should (a) phase in gradually, maybe only taking full effect 15 years out; (b) be override-able by a super majority of both the House and the Senate (say, 80% of each).

The former point is so that the voting on it isn’t derailed by catastrophic images of granny going hungry next year.

The latter point is so that we’re not forced (”forced”) to repeal it in 10 years when some major hit occurs – the ammendment can survive a massive war, a recession, etc.

tautology

February 2nd, 2010

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/world/…

Justice Minister Paul Denis said, “We may be weakened, but without laws the Haitian state would cease to exist.”

This is exactly the point that DF and I make so often.

Except:

(a) about the United States

(b) we mean it in a positive way

(c) there’s often talk of heroin vending robots

(d) burritos are involved