«
»

lunatics vs. Diebold

So Diebold makes voting machines.

…and they have problems, I hear.

And, of course, the nut-roots don’t believe in the “assume laziness and human nature before leaping to a conspiracy theory” aspect of Occam’s Razor, so every time a Republican won in a close race, it was Diebold manipulating the results.

Kinda crazy, but I can follow the “logic”: Diebold’s board of directors have a bunch of people who donate money to Republicans, and also, they’re evil white men, so, yeah, sure “conspiracy”.

Now, though, the nut-roots have risen to a whole new level of nuttiness, as seen on Reddit and other places where crazy people hang out.

The face that Hillary won in New Hampshire, instead of the anointed Obama, is *also* proof that the evil white men of Diebold manipulated the results.

(because we all know how much paunchy old white male members of the power structure love Hillary)

This entry was posted on Friday, January 11th, 2008 at 9:08 am and is filed under General. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

3 Responses to “lunatics vs. Diebold”

  1. Ed Flinn Says:
    January 11th, 2008 at 1:31 pm

    Hillary Derangement Syndrome? Maybe some folks are just prone to derangement in general.

  2. dearieme Says:
    January 11th, 2008 at 4:05 pm

    “paunchy old white male members”: is that a rude allusion to William Jefferson Clinton?

  3. tjic Says:
    January 11th, 2008 at 4:26 pm

    [quote comment="115821"]“paunchy old white male members”: is that a rude allusion to William Jefferson Clinton?[/quote]

    Not specifically…but I’d be lying if I didn’t think twice before choosing the word “member”…