racist admissions office boosts Black admission by equivalent of 450 SAT points relative to Asians
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/…
Is the glass half empty or half full?
Thomas J. Espendshade, a professor of sociology at Princeton University, used that question to answer a question about his new book, No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal: Race and Class in Elite College Admission and Campus Life (Princeton University Press), co-written with Alexandria Walton Radford, a research associate at MPR Associates. In fact, he could probably use the glass image to answer questions about numerous parts of the book.
While Espenshade and Radford — in the book and in interviews — avoid broad conclusions over whether affirmative action is working or should continue, their findings almost certainly will be used both by supporters and critics of affirmative action to advance their arguments. …
Unlike much writing about affirmative action, this book is based not on philosophy, but actual data — both on academic credentials and student experiences — from 9,000 students who attended one of 10 highly selective colleges and universities. (They are not named, but include public and private institutions, research universities and liberal arts colleges.)
Advantages by Race and Class on the SAT and ACT at Selective Colleges, Fall 1997
Group Public (ACT 36 scale) Private (SAT 1600 scale)
Race –White – – –Black
+3.8 +310 –Hispanic +0.3 +130 –Asian -3.4 -140
Class –Lower -0.1 +130 –Working
+0.0 +70 –Middle – – –Upper-Middle +0.3 +50
–Upper +0.4 -30 Class Rank by Race and Economic Class
Group Quintile 1
Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5 Race
–White 25.5% 20.8% 20.6% 17.3% 15.8%
–Black 4.8% 8.2% 13.6% 23.0% 50.5% –Hispanic 9.3%
13.1% 17.1% 27.7% 32.8% –Asian 20.2% 20.7% 21.9%
20.4% 16.9% Economic class
–Lower & working 13.0% 10.9% 19.9% 20.1% 36.1% –Middle
20.3% 18.6% 19.2% 20.7% 21.1% –Upper & upper middle 25.7%
21.6% 20.8% 16.9% 15.0%
Apalling Appalling.
Of course, as a libertarian, I think that Harvard, Cornell, etc. have every right to judge people not by the content of their character, but by the color of their skin.
I just think it’s apalling.

January 23rd, 2010 at 6:18 am
IMNSHO, in an article about the (quite real) sins of academia, any sort of blatant grammatical or spelling error is appalling, especially at the climax of one’s argument.
(Never fear, Travis, you’re still my hero. I hope I haven’t discomfited you. Unduly.)
January 23rd, 2010 at 9:27 am
[quote comment="230390"]IMNSHO, in an article about the (quite real) sins of academia, any sort of blatant grammatical or spelling error is appalling, especially at the climax of one’s argument.
[/quote]
Zing / sigh.
Fixed (but leaving the original in place, so that – unlike the NYT – my original mistakes and biases aren’t airbrushed away).
[quote comment="230390"]
(Never fear, Travis, you’re still my hero. I hope I haven’t discomfited you. Unduly.)[/quote]
Ha!
January 23rd, 2010 at 11:42 am
[quote comment="230390"]I hope I haven’t discomfited you. Unduly.)[/quote]
I dunno, I don’t think he was terribly comfited in the first place.
January 23rd, 2010 at 5:12 pm
[quote comment="230403"]
I dunno, I don’t think he was terribly comfited in the first place.[/quote]
Call me The Unconfited.
January 24th, 2010 at 2:19 am
Umm, you used apalling twice. :-)
And I agree that it’s appalling.
January 24th, 2010 at 5:33 pm
[quote comment="230413"]
Call me The Unconfited.[/quote]
Oh, LOL, “confit“!