eat that burrito ASAP, and then create some value!
Probably an abuse of data mining, but still interesting:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/09/busine…
![]()
the 10 countries where people spend less than 100 minutes eating and drinking each day have, as a group, consistently shown higher economic growth than those that took more than 100 minutes to savor their daily repasts.

May 15th, 2009 at 10:01 am
Sorry, but in this case I will trade lower GDP for more time to eat. Yum.
May 15th, 2009 at 11:08 am
[quote comment="200240"]Sorry, but in this case I will trade lower GDP for more time to eat. Yum.[/quote]
Nearly two hours isn’t enough time for lunch?
May 15th, 2009 at 2:19 pm
[quote comment="200243"][quote comment="200240"]Sorry, but in this case I will trade lower GDP for more time to eat. Yum.[/quote]
Nearly two hours isn’t enough time for lunch?[/quote]
It didn’t specify lunch.
May 15th, 2009 at 4:08 pm
[quote comment="200257"][quote comment="200243"][quote comment="200240"]Sorry, but in this case I will trade lower GDP for more time to eat. Yum.[/quote]
Nearly two hours isn’t enough time for lunch?[/quote]
It didn’t specify lunch.[/quote]
Well, that’s true. In fact, it said “time spent eating and drinking per day.” While I’m all for avoiding being rushed while eating, I can’t imagine I spend more than 70-80 or so (especially if we’re only considering time spent only eating, as opposed to snacking on popcorn while coding or something.)