Defence Scheme No. 1

I love the word “scheme”:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defence_Sch…

[ Canadian ] Defence Scheme No. 1 was created in 1921 and details a surprise attack on the northern U.S. [ by Canada ] as soon as possible after evidence was received of an American invasion of Canada. According to the plan, Canadian troops would immediately be sent to seize Seattle, Washington; Great Falls, Montana; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Albany, New York in a surprise attack. In case of heavy resistance, the Canadians would retreat to their own borders, destroying bridges and railways to hinder any retaliation by the Americans. The purpose of the invasion would be to allow time for Canada to prepare its war effort and to receive aid from Britain, or to limit the American invasion before the US government opted to discontinue the incursions…

Brown himself did reconnaissance for the plan, along with other lieutenant-colonels, all in plainclothes. These missions took place from 1921 and 1926. As historian Pierre Berton noted in his book Marching as to War, these investigations had “a zany flavour about it, reminiscent of the silent comedies of the day.” To illustrate this, Berton quoted from Brown’s reports, in which Brown recorded, among other things, that in Burlington, Vermont the people were “affable” and thus unusual for Americans; that Americans drink significantly less alcohol than Canadians…, and that upon pointing out that to Americans, one responded “My God! I’d go for a glass of beer. I’m going to ‘Canady’ to get some more”; that the people of Vermont would only be serious soldiers “if aroused”; and that many Americans might be sympathetic with the British cause.

3 Responses to “Defence Scheme No. 1”

  1. DJB Says:

    The military used to use the term “Scheme and Maneuver” in the Execution paragraph of an operations order (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operations_order) to describe how one planned to accomplish the mission from start to finish. They discontinued that phrasing in the mid nineties for some reason, but I continued to use it just because I like the verbiage.

    I also like the term “Violence of action” I just don’t get to say it as much being that I am now a practicing anesthesiologist and not kicking doors.

  2. HTRN Says:

    I knew those Canadadians couldn’t be trusted! Anybody who calls bacon “Ham” is obviously a person of questionable intentions! I betcha that the whole “nice” thing is a plot to lull us into complacancy… BEWARE THE NORTHERN MENACE! :)

  3. Noah D Says:

    I blame Canada.